#WR: What @WSJ
said about the Trump-Putin Summit? In “Trump Leaves GOP, Intelligence
Community and Allies in the Hot Seat”, the journalist Gerald F. Seib
made an analysis of the summit, remarking that the President didn’t
challenge Mr. Putin on interference in the 2016 election.
#WR:
One of the post-summit questions that the bloggers made in connection
with this story was: Had President Trump to confront President Putin in
public? Some of the bloggers say that Donald Trump acted right. #WSJ
#WR:
What the silence about controversial issues means ( annexation of
Crimea, interference in eastern Ukraine, poisoning of exiles in London
and the meddling in the 2016 American election)? According to the
observers, the silence was a tacit approval of the Putin actions. #WSJ
#WR:
In an interview after the summit, President Putin affirmed that he
wanted that Donald Trump won the 2016 election. This statement gives an
indirect answer to a possible interference… (?) #WSJ
#WR:
President Trump conducted the summit with Mr. Putin ignoring the advice
of GOP lawmakers and intelligence community. What are the legal
implications of his “verbal agreements” with President Putin for our
country? (Open question) #WSJ
#WR:
After the Trump-Putin summit, some observers asked themselves: Are
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron in
the list of current Trump’s friends? #WSJ
No comments:
Post a Comment