#WR:
Do you know what is “Fear”? Probably, you know the explanation of
Merriam-Webster about “fear”: “unpleasant emotion caused by expectation
of awareness of danger”. But do you know what is “Fear: Trump in the
White House”.
@washingtonpost@nytimes@WSJ
#WR:
“Fear: Trump in the White House”, is a book published for Bob Woodward,
investigative journalist of The Washington Post about the domestic life
in the White House since Day 1 with critical pictures about the
President. @nytimes, @washingtonpost@WSJ
#WR:
Really, we cannot ignore “Fear” of Bob Woodward. But attention! We
have to read this book about White House's domestic issues without the
intention to spread “fear” for the pleasure of creating chaos. Some
readers are using the material with harmful intentions. @nytimes
#WR:
By the way, due to the publishing of “Fear: Trump in the White House”,
we know that some White House insiders were near to generate a revolt
against the President. Till now, it is not clear who was the leader of
the revolt. @nytimes@WSJ
#WR: The story titled “A Road Map of ‘Crazytown’” of @nytimes
analyzes ““Fear: Trump in the White House” with details that can be
dangerous in the hands of non-adult readers. For example, it includes
very sensitive statements of the Defense Secretary related to the
President.
#WR:
According to Bob Woodward, Jim Mattis in White House conversations
said: “The president did not understand the importance of allies
overseas, the value of the diplomacy or the relationship between
military, the economy and intelligence partnerships with foreign
governments”.
#WR: Interesting study of @dwnews
about the foreign workers that come to Germany today. According to
this important German services of news, the expats (foreign people who
come to Germany for living) are not welcomed in this most important EU
country like in previous decades.
#WR:
Why social media is frequently in the dock? Today again, Facebook and
Twitter were grilled by the Senate Intelligence Committee of the U.S.
Congress. This is the third time in less than a year. Why? There are a
lot of criticism about the social networks. @WSJ, @nytimes
#WR: Criticism against #socialmedia? Today @nytimes wrote: “For months, #Facebook, #Twitter and #Google
have grappled with criticism over the misuse of their services by
foreign operatives and the disproportionate influence their platforms
have over people’s thinking.”
#WR: Criticism against #socialmedia!!! According to @WSJ
Attorney General Jeff Sessions wants to see if "social-media giants may
be harming competition and “intentionally stifling” certain viewpoints,
stepping up pressure on the platforms over alleged anti-conservative
bias."
#WR: Social media and "political bias". We have to remember that some days ago, President Trump accused #Google
of "political bias". Today, Google didn't participate of the Congress
hearing. Larry Page CEO of Alphabet, Google's parent, was not "on hand
to absorb the blows." @WSJ
#WR: Are the social media networks responsible of the contents? While the Senate Intelligence Committee was asking to #Facebook and #Twitter
questions about their “apparent negligence” in the administration of
the networks, the people of tech world have different opinions. @WSJ
#WR: Debate about the responsibility of the #socialmedia
related to contents. Some observers say the networks are not
responsible of the contents posted by their users. Others believe the
networks have to play the role of “gendarme” of Internet to guarantee a
safe platform. @WSJ
